Renaissance thinking

‘Being good at one thing in life, especially art skills, will make you better at everything else. Acting will make you a better director, and editing audio and video will make you a better writer; your skill in one art is transferable to other art forms. That’s one of the secrets to life.’  Michael W. Dean

Renaissance thinking is the desire to gain in-depth knowledge in more than one area of expertise. The term is based on Renaissance humanism, which encouraged people to develop their capacities as fully as possible. 

The most famous Renaissance thinker is of course Leonardo da Vinci, whose contributions to science are as impressive as his work as an artist. Other famous examples from more recent historical periods include Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, who has made his mark not only in the field of literature but also through his work on optics. Lewis Caroll (aka Reverend Charles Lutwidge Dodgson), who created a legacy not only through Alice in Wonderland and other fiction writing, but also through his work in mathematics and logic. J.R.R. Tolkien, who in addition to his contribution to literature through The Hobbit, Lord of the Rings and other writings, also made an impressive contribution to academia within the field of English Language and Literature. For example, while working as a professor at the University of Leeds he produced A Middle English Vocabulary and, with E. V. Gordon, a definitive edition of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, both becoming academic standard works for many decades. Cher, one of our contemporaries, is not only a music icon but also an Oscar-winning actress.

I have to confess, I’ve pondered over the issue of Renaissance thinking versus legacy focus for quite some time now, and I am still very much confused by what I perceive as a tension between the two concepts. On the one hand, ideas such as the Hedgehog Concept and the Dip seem to suggest to only go for one big thing, rather than spreading yourself thin across many areas. And that seems to make logical sense. On the other hand, there are many cases of legacy creators (such as the ones above, plus many more) who seemed to have managed to create lasting legacies across a variety of sometimes vastly different fields.

Personally, for all my talking of legacy focus, or about the importance of abandoning all else in the favour of one overriding Hedgehog Concept, my heart very much belongs to Renaissance thinking. Over the past few years, this has led me to some pretty radical changes in my life. After several years spent engrossed in academic research, I suddenly changed direction to go into entrepreneurship, along with a stint in politics. Having given birth or contributed to a variety of entrepreneurial legacy projects, completed my PhD, and abandoned the idea of launching my political career (I realised pretty early on it was a cul-de-sac for me), I have now returned to my childhood passion for creative writing and my teenage passion for acting.  Along with starting a blog, of course, and working on a variety of ebooks related to the practical aspects of creating legacy, some of which I will reveal on this site over the coming months.

So yeah, Renaissance thinking seems to be my thing, and I always have to be careful not to be sidetracked into other interests before completing the legacy project I’m working on (so far, I’ve been pretty good at that, come to think of it – I don’t like unfinished business; legacy projects HAVE to be completed if they’re not a cul-de-sac, no matter what other shiny prospects catch your eye). There are SO many exhilarating things to experience in this life, and I feel I am yet so young and so eager to explore different options. Our daily experiences continually change us as human beings, sometimes to the core – and Renaissance thinking allows us to acknowledge these changes and use them to gain in-depth insights into the different aspects of life.

There is one thing in particular I have noticed about Renaissance thinking - and this is where I think Michael Dean’s quote is bang on. It does seem to me like the more areas you explore and set up legacy projects in, the better equipped you are for your next legacy project, even though in a completely different area of expertise. My experience of entrepreneurship helped me enormously when it came to writing my PhD thesis; similarly, my experience of writing my thesis is helping me keep going with this blog, even on days when I don’t feel like writing.

It also seems to me that as long as you are careful to complete the legacy projects you start (or else to quit as soon as you realise you’re in a cul-de-sac, as I did with politics), it’s okay to embrace Renaissance thinking. What you’ll probably notice is that you will start making connections between things that people don’t normally associate with one another, simply because you will have all this in-depth expertise in other areas to draw from, every time you start a new legacy project. For example, the Hobbit and Lord of the Rings have greatly benefitted from J.R.R. Tolkien’s academic expertise in the field of English Language and linguistics – expertise in one area led to an amazing creation in another area. Everything in this world is connected, and as long as we use our detours to get back to creating our path, the legacy projects we set up will be all the more complex and enriching to the people who experience them.  

Okay, I’ve ranted on long enough – what do you think?

If you feel the same way I do, you may want to embrace Renaissance thinking as part of your quest to create legacy. Indeed, Renaissance thinking can make your learning experiences in new areas of endeavour go more smoothly, as you can use the expertise gained in one area to master another area. As long as you make sure your Renaissance thinking helps your legacy focus, having this kind of thinking opens up a world of opportunities.

The time is now.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Legacy focus

“Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.”  Antoine de Saint-Exupery

To create legacy, you need to learn how to focus on what is important and eliminate everything else. In particular, your focus needs to be directed almost entirely on working towards your legacy goal. This is what I call legacy focus.

Legacy focus can only come after you have done your legacy sampling, and have decided once and for all what your legacy goal is. Start your legacy focus too early, and you end up having to start all over again once you realise your mistake. However, once you have found your legacy goal, you have to get out of sampling mode and apply legacy focus to it.

 Getting rid of all the non-essential stuff in our lives is difficult. This is especially the case if we keep comparing ourselves to our peers who have resigned themselves to the 9-5 lifestyle and need all the extra stuff to make them feel like their decision is necessary. But for those of us who want to create legacy, all the extra stuff detracts from our legacy focus.

 What kind of extra stuff am I talking about? It comes in three categories:

  1. The first category is commitments we take on that do not help us progress with our legacy goal (e.g. becoming the treasurer of our local church; agreeing to meet up with a friend for coffee every week; taking on a skills class out of interest rather than because we need it for our legacy goal).
  2. The second category is made up of all the junk we accumulate in our lives, that leads to a loss of resources which would be better spent on our legacy goal. A heavy mortgage, or owning a car in a smallish city, are just two examples – both expensive and tying us down instead of freeing up our resources and our mobility. And then of course there’s all the other, smaller pieces of junk we accumulate, which ends up cluttering our space and draining us of mental energy.
  3. The third category is an overlap between the other two: it is the commitment to buy useless junk for other people. This of course takes up both the time we need to find the stuff, and the money it takes to buy it. Piles of gifts we have to buy every Christmas for our loved ones is a personal pet hate of mine. Half the stuff ends up in the bin or in charity shops, and all the time spent on finding it is wasted.

 As you can see, sticking with our legacy focus leads to being a somewhat difficult person, who does not go for all the senseless garbage we take into our lives every day out of politeness. Legacy focus takes not only determination, but the willingness to be seen as rude and anti-social. Are you up for that, and all the social ostracism that inevitably ensues?

The time is now.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

How to find your Hedgehog Concept

‘Look and you will find it – what is unsought will go undetected.’  Sophocles

Here are 6 key points to finding your Hedgehog Concept:

1. The key is to understanding what you can be the best in the world at, and also what you cannot be the best at – not what you want to be the best at. The Hedgehog Concept is not a goal, a strategy, or intention; it is an understanding.

2. If you cannot be the best in the world at what you are doing at the moment, then what you are doing at the moment cannot form the basis of your Hedgehog Concept

3. The ‘best in the world’ understanding is a much more severe standard than a core competence. You might have a competence but not necessarily have the capacity to be truly the best in the world at that competence. Conversely, there may be activities at which you could become the best in the world, but at which you have no current competence

 4. Set your goals and strategies based on understanding, not bravado

 5. Getting the Hedgehog Concept is an iterative process. The Collins study found that it took four years on average for the good-to-great companies to get a Hedgehog Concept. The process might be quicker for an individual, but don’t count on it.

 6. You do not need to be in a great industry to produce sustained great results. In the study, no matter how bad the industry, every good-to-great company figured out how to produce truly superior economic returns.

The time is now.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Using the Hedgehog Concept to create legacy

‘Most people have no idea of the giant capacity we can immediately command when we focus all our resources on mastering a single area of our lives.’  Anthony Robbins

A Hedgehog Concept is a simple, crystalline concept that flows from deep understanding about the understanding of the following three circles:

 1. What you can be the best in the world at (and, equally important, what you cannot be the best in the world at). This discerning standard goes far beyond core competence. Just because you possess a core competence doesn’t necessarily mean you can be the best in the world at it. Conversely, what you can be best at might not even be something in which you are currently engaged.

 2. What drives your economic engine. All the good-to-great attained piercing insight into how to most effectively generate sustained and robust cash flow and profitability. In particular, they discovered the single denominator – profit per x – that had the greatest impact on their economics.

 3. What you are deeply passionate about. The good-to-great companies focused on those activities that ignited their passion. The idea here is not to stimulate passion but to discover what makes you passionate.

 To have a fully developed Hedgehog Concept, you need all three circles. If you make a lot of money doing things at which you could never be the best, you’ll only build a successful company, not a great one. If you become the best at something, you’ll never remain on top if you don’t have intrinsic passion for what you are doing. Finally, you can be passionate all you want, but if you can’t be the best at it or it doesn’t make economic sense, then you might have a lot of fun, but you won’t produce great results.

The time is now.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Why it’s better to be a hedgehog than a fox

‘It’s not what’s happening to you now or what has happened in your past that determines who you become. Rather, it’s your decisions about what to focus on, what things mean to you, and what you’re going to do about them that will determine your ultimate destiny.’  Anthony Robbins

Isaiah Berlin extrapolated from the fox and hedgehog parable to divide people into two basic groups: foxes and hedgehogs. Foxes pursue many ends at the same time and see the world in all its complexity. They are ‘scattered and diffused, moving on many levels,’ says Berlin, never integrating their thinking into one overall concept or unifying vision. Hedgehogs, on the other hand, simplify a complex world into a single organising idea, a basic principle or concept that unifies and guides everything. It doesn’t matter how complex the world, a hedgehog reduces all challenges and dilemmas to simple – almost simplistic – hedgehog ideas. For a hedgehog, anything that does not somehow relate to the hedgehog idea holds no relevance.

So why is it better to be a hedgehog than a fox? Princetown Professor Martin Bressler pointed out the power of the hedgehog in a study of successful companies. He maintains that being a hedgehog is what separates those companies who make the biggest impact from all the others who are just as smart. Freud and the unconscious, Darwin and natural selection, Marx and class struggle, Einstein and relativity, Adam smith and the division of labour – they were all hedgehogs. They took a complex world and simplified it. According to Bressler, ‘those who leave the biggest footprints have thousands calling after them, “Good idea, but you went too far!”‘ But as a result of their (often controversial) unifying concept, these others are commenting on their work and therefore making it spread like wildfire.

 In the book ‘Good to great’, Jim Collins and his research team found that those who built great companies were, to one degree or another, hedgehogs. They used their hedgehog nature to drive toward what the team came to call a hedgehog concept, which I will talk about in the next post. Those who led the comparison companies tended to be foxes, never gaining the clarifying advantage that being a hedgehog provides, being instead scattered, diffused, and inconsistent.

Think carefully about your tendencies – whether you are more like a hedghog than a fox. Does your passion change with the wind, do you keep chasing dream after dream but never really completing anything? Be careful if this is the case – you are wasting precious time. Remember - hedghogs tend to leave the biggest footprint. Find what it is that you really want, and stick to it.

The time is now.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Are you a fox or a hedgehog?

‘It is simply a matter of doing what you do best and not worrying about what the other fellow is going to do.’  John Adams

In today’s blog post, I will continue talking about the theme of passion in relation to creating legacy by telling you a story about the fox and the hedgehog.

There is an ancient Greek parable which says: ‘The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.’ The fox is a cunning creature, able to devise a myriad of complex strategies for sneak attacks upon the hedgehog. Day in and day out, the fox circles around the hedgehog’s den, waiting for the perfect moment to pounce. Fast, sleek, beautiful, fleet of foot, and crafty – the fox looks like the sure winner. The hedgehog, on the other hand, is a dowdier creature, looking like a genetic mix-up between a porcupine and a small armadillo. He waddles along, going about his simple day, searching for lunch and taking care of his home.

 The fox waits in cunning silence at the juncture in the trail. The hedgehog, minding his own business, wanders right into the path of the fox. ‘Aha, I’ve got you now!’ thinks the fox. He leaps out, bounding across the ground, lightning fast. The little hedgehog, sensing danger, looks up and thinks, ‘Here we go again. Will he ever learn?’ Rolling up into a perfect little ball, the hedgehog becomes a sphere of sharp spikes, pointing outward in all directions. The fox, bounding towards his prey, sees the hedgehog defence and calls off the attack. Retreating back to the forest, the fox begins to calculate a new line of attack. Each day, some version of his battle between the hedgehog and the fox takes place, and despite the greater cunning of the fox, the hedgehog always wins.

 Which one of these are you? In the next blog post, I will reveal what makes ‘hedgehog thinking’ so unique, and why in case you are a fox you might want to become a hedgehog.

The time is now.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

The value of legacy sampling

I am learning all the time. The tombstone will be my diploma.’  Eartha Kitt

In the last blog post, I outlined three reasons why following your passion is smart, especially when it comes to creating legacy. But what if you don’t yet know what your true passion is? What if you find lots of things fascinating, but don’t yet know enough about them to be able to decide which of these is your true passion? If this sounds familiar, you may have to do some legacy sampling.

Legacy sampling is a period of time in which you try out different things in order to find your true passion. This may take a number of years (my legacy sampling phase lasted 3 years), or it may be relatively quick.

When legacy sampling, aim to do two things:

1. Gather as much in-depth experience in as many fields as possible. This knowledge will later help you when pursuing your legacy goal by providing you with an understanding of the way in which different areas of work are connected.

2. Constantly refine what it is you are after long-term. What gets you excited to get up in the morning? What are you particularly good at? What are you particularly bad at? What do other people think about your skills?

Enjoy the process of legacy sampling. Once you find your true passion, decide on a legacy goal, and start working on legacy projects towards that goal, you will no longer have much time to dabble into so many diverse fields of activity. So the legacy sampling phase is a time during which serendipity is your muse, gradually guiding you towards your true calling. Don’t rush this phase, and keep listening to what your heart is telling you.

The time is now.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

3 reasons why following your passion is smart

If there is no passion in your life, then have you really lived? Find your passion, whatever it may be. Become it, and let it become you and you will find great things happen for you, to you and because of you.’  T. Alan Armstrong

In yesterday’s blog post, we talked about why going for the deferred life plan does not pay off in the long run. So what about choosing to create legacy with something that is your passion? As you can guess by now, my advice would be that yes, following your passion is the thing to do.

But what if your passion is in an area that is not mainstream? An area that is judged as ‘uncool’ by the rest of the world? Wouldn’t it be more sensible to create legacy in something that is in vogue, something that is likely to sell and therefore guarantee that your aim of creating legacy is financially sustainable?

Here’s what I think: following your passion, no matter how ‘uncool’, is the most sensible thing you can do. Here are 3 reasons why:

1. ‘Success’ may never come. Even if you choose to create legacy in an area that is en vogue, you may never reach what most people see as ’success’ – i.e. recognition, money, fame and the like. But all that doesn’t matter if you’re working on something you love. You are already being successful through living out your passion on a daily basis, fulfilling your potential. Much better than taking on something that appears ’sexy’ to the rest of the world, only to be stuck with it without much chance of getting to a satisfactory level so you can move on to what you really wanted to do in the first place.

2. You are more likely to get through the Dip. Remember the Dip? That awful time when nothing seems to be going right and you just have to keep plodding on? Well, then you also know that at the end of the Dip, your legacy projects finally get the recognition, resources and all the other things they deserve. Trouble is, even if you start a project armed with passion you are likely to have a hard time in the Dip. Without passion, your chances are substantially diminished, and you’re more likely to quit. Which means, none of the wonderful things that could have happened on the other side of the Dip are likely to happen to your project. It’s more sensible therefore to go for a project you care deeply about, no matter how ‘uncool’ it seems to others. They’ll change their mind once you’ve conquered the Dip.

3. You are the one who is going to have to live with your choice. If what others are telling you to choose seems to make sense but doesn’t turn you on, remember that it is you who is going to have to live with that choice. It is you who is going to have to take it through the Dip, daily, perhaps for years and years and years. Yes, making your own choices instead of letting others choose for you means that you may get into conflict with them; but is avoiding conflict with others so important that you are willing to sacrifice what you feel in your gut is the right thing to do? And yes, if your legacy project fails, you will have to deal with the ‘I told you so’ moments, spoken or unspoken, that those same others will pile upon you. But at least you will know that you’ve made your own mistakes, that you’ve failed in something that you have chosen – and most likely, you will want to get back on your feet as soon as possible to put what you have learned from your failure to good use with another project. If, on the other hand, you go with what others have chosen for you and you fail, most of what you have learned in the process will be meaningless, and you are more likely to feel so defeated as to give up on your own ambitions.

Don’t let others decide your life for you. Take charge of your own destiny, and go for your passion. It is the most sensible thing to do.

The time is now.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Beware of the deferred life plan

‘It is foolish to postpone enjoyment of your ordinary life until you are more successful, more secure, or more loved than you are today.’  Timothy Ray Miller

In his book The Monk and the Riddle, entrepreneur Randy Komisar warns against going for what he calls ‘the deferred life plan’. The term, as Randy Komisar uses it, refers to choosing careers, projects etc. that we think will lead to financial stability, and postponing what we really want to do with our life until an undefined time in the future when we finally feel we can afford it.

According to Randy Komisar, the deferred life plan does not pay off, regardless of how driven you are. For starters, what happens if despite all your effort and hard work you do not reach the big promotion or the big salary you were hoping for? Also, is financial security really worth sacrificing the best years of your life for an indefinite time in the future? How much is your time worth? And when will you consider yourself to be financially secure? Bigger paychecks often lead to a more expensive lifestyle and therefore higher expenses – financial security is relative. Most importantly of all: why not work hard because you find the work meaningful, rather than so you can move on to the next thing?

The concept of the deferred life plan is highly relevant to thinking about your legacy project, particularly in light of our discussion of failure over the last few blog posts. It is often the case that when a legacy project fails, the legacy creator starts having second doubts about dedicating their life to creating legacy instead of settling for something safe and predictable. Seeing your peers in cushy jobs and going on expensive holidays doesn’t help - especially when you’re barely making ends meet while having to deal with failure and the ‘I told you so’ stares of those around you. And worse than that, you start doubting yourself, your own abilities, your vision for the future.

So amidst all this, the deferred life plan starts looking better by the minute. ‘I’ll go back into a safe job for a couple of years - once I’m financially stable enough, I’ll go back to creating legacy’, you tell yourself. There’s nothing wrong with wanting safety and predictability in your life – most of us do. And if going into a safe job will tie you over for a while, fine. But don’t postpone creating legacy until that job is over, or until you feel you are financially stable.

Start your next legacy project as soon as you can mentally handle it – in parallel with your safe job, if you must. Don’t let a single day pass by when you are not working on creating legacy, when you are not either planning for or doing work on a legacy project. Otherwise, you are not using your safe job to make creating legacy possible – instead, you are simply deluding yourself by adopting the deferred life plan. The couple of years become a couple of decades, and a couple of decades more – and before you know it, it is too late.

The time is now.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Failure as a new beginning

Every new beginning comes from some other beginning’s end.’  Seneca

One of the best ways to see the failure of your legacy project is as a new beginning.

Think about it. You’ve failed. You’re at your lowest. Things can’t get much worse than they are now. This is the best time to start something new and bold. It is the dawn of a new, awe-inspiring chapter in your life. Don’t miss this opportunity. Grab it with both hands.

The time is now.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)